Pork, oriental style, dehydrated vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, oriental style, dehydrated
5 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 615 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 373% more |
| Protein | 11.8 g ★ | 2.69 g | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 339% more |
| Carbs | 1.4 g | 28.17 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 95% more |
| Fat | 62.4 g | 0.28 g ★ | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 22186% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.05 g | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 685 mg | 382 mg ★ | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 79% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg ★ | 10 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 0.5 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 150% more |
| Potassium | 139 mg ★ | 35 mg | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 297% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.