Quail, cooked, total edible vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Quail, cooked, total edible
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Quail, cooked, total edible | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 227 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Quail, cooked, total edible has 152% more |
| Protein | 25.1 g ★ | 2.01 g | Quail, cooked, total edible has 1149% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 14.1 g | 0.15 g ★ | Quail, cooked, total edible has 9300% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 52 mg | 36 mg ★ | Quail, cooked, total edible has 44% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Iron | 4.43 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Quail, cooked, total edible has 542% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Potassium | 216 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.