Rhubarb, frozen, cooked, with sugar vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rhubarb, frozen, cooked, with sugar
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Rhubarb, frozen, cooked, with sugar | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Rhubarb, frozen, cooked, with sugar has 29% more |
| Protein | 0.39 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Carbs | 31.2 g ★ | 20.71 g | Rhubarb, frozen, cooked, with sugar has 51% more |
| Fat | 0.05 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sugar | 28.7 g | 6.48 g ★ | Rhubarb, frozen, cooked, with sugar has 343% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 145 mg ★ | 38 mg | Rhubarb, frozen, cooked, with sugar has 282% more |
| Iron | 0.21 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Potassium | 96 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.