Rutabagas, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rutabagas, raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Rutabagas, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 37 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
| Protein | 1.08 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
| Carbs | 8.62 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Fat | 0.16 g | 0.15 g ★ | Rutabagas, raw has 7% more |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
| Sugar | 4.46 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
| Sodium | 12 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Calcium | 43 mg ★ | 38 mg | Rutabagas, raw has 13% more |
| Iron | 0.44 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Vitamin C | 25 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Rutabagas, raw has 28% more |
| Potassium | 305 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.