Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 110 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 28% more |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 99% more |
| Carbs | 18.6 g ★ | 0 g | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 0% more |
| Fat | 4.4 g ★ | 5.28 g | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 17% more |
| Fiber | 0.1 g ★ | 0 g | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 0% more |
| Sugar | 16.32 g | 0 g ★ | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 0% more |
| Sodium | 1148 mg | 90 mg ★ | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 1176% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg ★ | 8 mg | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 200% more |
| Iron | 0.18 mg | 0.45 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 60% more |
| Potassium | 29 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 93% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.