Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 153 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents has 28% more |
| Protein | 20.63 g ★ | 4.4 g | Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents has 369% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 7.17 g | 1.92 g ★ | Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents has 273% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 433 mg | 7 mg ★ | Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents has 6086% more |
| Calcium | 198 mg ★ | 17 mg | Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents has 1065% more |
| Iron | 0.57 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 62% more |
| Potassium | 329 mg ★ | 172 mg | Salmon, sockeye, canned, total can contents has 91% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.