Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt
8 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 67% more |
| Protein | 2.48 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 90% more |
| Carbs | 10.81 g ★ | 0 g | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 0% more |
| Fat | 0.62 g ★ | 5.28 g | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 88% more |
| Fiber | 4.9 g ★ | 0 g | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 0% more |
| Sugar | 4.9 g | 0 g ★ | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 0% more |
| Sodium | 8 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 91% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 8 mg | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 113% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 4% more |
| Vitamin C | 9.5 mg ★ | 0 mg | Squash, winter, hubbard, baked, without salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 358 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 18% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.