Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 12% more |
| Protein | 19.58 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 37% more |
| Fat | 7.42 g | 3.57 g ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 108% more |
| Sodium | 108 mg | 74 mg ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, fore, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 46% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg ★ | 15 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 0.99 mg | 1.04 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 5% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.