Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean only, raw vs Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean only, raw
3 wins
🏆
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
4 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean only, raw | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 122 kcal ★ | 246 kcal | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 50% more |
| Protein | 20.37 g | 24.04 g ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 15% more |
| Fat | 4.47 g ★ | 15.94 g | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 72% more |
| Sodium | 98 mg | 83 mg ★ | Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean only, raw has 18% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 26 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 35% more |
| Iron | 3.08 mg ★ | 2.59 mg | Veal, Australian, shank, hind, bone-in, separable lean only, raw has 19% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 335 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.