Archway Home Style Cookies, Dutch Cocoa vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Archway Home Style Cookies, Dutch Cocoa
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Archway Home Style Cookies, Dutch Cocoa | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 431 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Dutch Cocoa has 379% more |
| Protein | 4.5 g ★ | 2.01 g | Archway Home Style Cookies, Dutch Cocoa has 124% more |
| Carbs | 69.44 g ★ | 20.71 g | Archway Home Style Cookies, Dutch Cocoa has 235% more |
| Fat | 14.99 g | 0.15 g ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Dutch Cocoa has 9893% more |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
| Sugar | 35.35 g | 6.48 g ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Dutch Cocoa has 446% more |
| Sodium | 384 mg | 36 mg ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Dutch Cocoa has 967% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Iron | 3.36 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Archway Home Style Cookies, Dutch Cocoa has 387% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 239 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.