Archway Home Style Cookies, Oatmeal vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Archway Home Style Cookies, Oatmeal
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Archway Home Style Cookies, Oatmeal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 421 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Oatmeal has 368% more |
| Protein | 5.48 g ★ | 2.01 g | Archway Home Style Cookies, Oatmeal has 173% more |
| Carbs | 68.17 g ★ | 20.71 g | Archway Home Style Cookies, Oatmeal has 229% more |
| Fat | 14.08 g | 0.15 g ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Oatmeal has 9287% more |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 12% more |
| Sugar | 34.5 g | 6.48 g ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Oatmeal has 432% more |
| Sodium | 394 mg | 36 mg ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Oatmeal has 994% more |
| Calcium | 35 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 8% more |
| Iron | 2.45 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Archway Home Style Cookies, Oatmeal has 255% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 219 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.