Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 468 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies has 420% more |
| Protein | 5.17 g ★ | 2.01 g | Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies has 157% more |
| Carbs | 72.23 g ★ | 20.71 g | Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies has 249% more |
| Fat | 17.55 g | 0.15 g ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies has 11600% more |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sugar | 32.64 g | 6.48 g ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies has 404% more |
| Sodium | 471 mg | 36 mg ★ | Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies has 1208% more |
| Calcium | 36 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
| Iron | 3.06 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Archway Home Style Cookies, Old Fashioned Windmill Cookies has 343% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 113 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.