Babyfood, cereal, rice, prepared with whole milk vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, cereal, rice, prepared with whole milk
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, cereal, rice, prepared with whole milk | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 85 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 6% more |
| Protein | 3.45 g ★ | 2.01 g | Babyfood, cereal, rice, prepared with whole milk has 72% more |
| Carbs | 10.31 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Fat | 3.38 g | 0.15 g ★ | Babyfood, cereal, rice, prepared with whole milk has 2153% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 4.87 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
| Sodium | 42 mg | 36 mg ★ | Babyfood, cereal, rice, prepared with whole milk has 17% more |
| Calcium | 168 mg ★ | 38 mg | Babyfood, cereal, rice, prepared with whole milk has 342% more |
| Iron | 3.63 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Babyfood, cereal, rice, prepared with whole milk has 426% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 151 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.