Bamboo shoots, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bamboo shoots, raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Bamboo shoots, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 27 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Protein | 2.6 g ★ | 2.01 g | Bamboo shoots, raw has 29% more |
| Carbs | 5.2 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Bamboo shoots, raw has 100% more |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Sugar | 3 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Iron | 0.5 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
| Vitamin C | 4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
| Potassium | 533 mg ★ | 475 mg | Bamboo shoots, raw has 12% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.