Bear, polar, meat, raw (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bear, polar, meat, raw (Alaska Native)
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Bear, polar, meat, raw (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 130 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Bear, polar, meat, raw (Alaska Native) has 8% more |
| Protein | 25.6 g ★ | 4.4 g | Bear, polar, meat, raw (Alaska Native) has 482% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 1.92 g ★ | Bear, polar, meat, raw (Alaska Native) has 61% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 17 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 6.1 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Bear, polar, meat, raw (Alaska Native) has 309% more |
| Vitamin C | 2 mg ★ | 0 mg | Bear, polar, meat, raw (Alaska Native) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 40 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.