Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, select, cooked, braised vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, select, cooked, braised
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, select, cooked, braised | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 186 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, select, cooked, braised has 107% more |
| Protein | 32.29 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, select, cooked, braised has 1506% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 6.34 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, select, cooked, braised has 4127% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 68 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, select, cooked, braised has 89% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Iron | 2.84 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, chuck for stew, separable lean and fat, select, cooked, braised has 312% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 320 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.