Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 237 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 163% more |
| Protein | 28.02 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 1294% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 13 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 8567% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 72 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 100% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 3.47 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 403% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 351 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.