Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 178 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 98% more |
| Protein | 27.96 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 1291% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 6.48 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 4220% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 59 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 64% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Iron | 1.71 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 148% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 365 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.