Beef, New Zealand, imported, brisket navel end, separable lean and fat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, brisket navel end, separable lean and fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, brisket navel end, separable lean and fat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 345 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, brisket navel end, separable lean and fat, raw has 188% more |
| Protein | 15.81 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, brisket navel end, separable lean and fat, raw has 259% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 31.27 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, brisket navel end, separable lean and fat, raw has 1529% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 54 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, brisket navel end, separable lean and fat, raw has 671% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Iron | 1.11 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 26% more |
| Potassium | 223 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, brisket navel end, separable lean and fat, raw has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.