Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 181 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 51% more |
| Protein | 19.38 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 340% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 11.45 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 496% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 53 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 657% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 1.89 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 27% more |
| Potassium | 295 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.