Beef, New Zealand, imported, flank, separable lean and fat, raw vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, flank, separable lean and fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, flank, separable lean and fat, raw | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, flank, separable lean and fat, raw has 164% more |
| Protein | 20.12 g ★ | 3.15 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, flank, separable lean and fat, raw has 539% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Fat | 8.9 g | 3.25 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, flank, separable lean and fat, raw has 174% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 46 mg | 43 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, flank, separable lean and fat, raw has 7% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 96% more |
| Iron | 1.53 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, flank, separable lean and fat, raw has 5000% more |
| Potassium | 323 mg ★ | 132 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, flank, separable lean and fat, raw has 145% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.