Beef, New Zealand, imported, inside, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, inside, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, inside, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 128 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, inside, raw has 42% more |
| Protein | 22.16 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, inside, raw has 1002% more |
| Carbs | 0.1 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.36 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, inside, raw has 2807% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 40 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, inside, raw has 11% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 2.27 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, inside, raw has 229% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 338 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 29% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.