Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked vs Bananas, raw
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Bananas, raw
7 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked | Bananas, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 560 kcal | 89 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 529% more |
| Protein | 7.9 g ★ | 1.09 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 625% more |
| Carbs | 3.39 g | 22.84 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 85% more |
| Fat | 57.22 g | 0.33 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 17239% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.6 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 12.23 g | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg | 1 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 2400% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg ★ | 5 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 220% more |
| Iron | 1.18 mg ★ | 0.26 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 354% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 8.7 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Potassium | 125 mg | 358 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.