Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 560 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 281% more |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 74% more |
| Carbs | 3.39 g ★ | 0 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 0% more |
| Fat | 57.22 g | 2.08 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 2651% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 75% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg ★ | 9 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 78% more |
| Iron | 1.18 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, cooked has 66% more |
| Potassium | 125 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 50% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.