Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw
5 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 602 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 887% more |
| Protein | 6.97 g ★ | 3.15 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 121% more |
| Carbs | 0.01 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Fat | 63.78 g | 3.25 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 1862% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 32 mg ★ | 43 mg | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 26% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 90% more |
| Iron | 0.76 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 2433% more |
| Potassium | 143 mg ★ | 132 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 8% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.