Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 602 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 402% more |
| Protein | 6.97 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 58% more |
| Carbs | 0.01 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 63.78 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 3222% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 32 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 357% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Iron | 0.76 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 49% more |
| Potassium | 143 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 17% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.