Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 602 kcal 90 kcal Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 569% more
Protein 6.97 g 2.01 g Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 247% more
Carbs 0.01 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 63.78 g 0.15 g Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 42420% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 32 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more
Calcium 11 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more
Iron 0.76 mg 0.69 mg Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 10% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 143 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.