Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 119 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 1% more |
| Protein | 21.23 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, raw has 383% more |
| Carbs | 0.23 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 99% more |
| Fat | 3.68 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, raw has 92% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 55 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, raw has 686% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 1.95 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, raw has 31% more |
| Potassium | 340 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, manufacturing beef, raw has 98% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.