Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 731 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 1098% more |
| Protein | 6.5 g ★ | 3.15 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 106% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Fat | 78.3 g | 3.25 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 2309% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg ★ | 43 mg | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 42% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 85% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 1467% more |
| Potassium | 129 mg | 132 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 2% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.