Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Oats (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
0 wins
🏆
Oats (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)
9 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Oats (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 731 kcal | 389 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 88% more |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 16.89 g ★ | Oats (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) has 62% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 66.27 g ★ | Oats (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) has 100% more |
| Fat | 78.3 g | 6.9 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 1035% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 10.6 g ★ | Oats (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) has 100% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg | 2 mg ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 1150% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 54 mg ★ | Oats (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) has 69% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 4.72 mg ★ | Oats (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) has 90% more |
| Potassium | 129 mg | 429 mg ★ | Oats (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) has 70% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.