Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Spinach, raw
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Spinach, raw
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Spinach, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 731 kcal | 23 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 3078% more |
| Protein | 6.5 g ★ | 2.86 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 127% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.63 g ★ | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Fat | 78.3 g | 0.39 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 19977% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g ★ | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.42 g | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg ★ | 79 mg | Spinach, raw has 68% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 99 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 83% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 2.71 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 83% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 28.1 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Potassium | 129 mg | 558 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.