Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Spinach, raw
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Spinach, raw
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Spinach, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 685 kcal | 23 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 2878% more |
| Protein | 8.5 g ★ | 2.86 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 197% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.63 g ★ | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Fat | 72.38 g | 0.39 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 18459% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.2 g ★ | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.42 g | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Sodium | 26 mg ★ | 79 mg | Spinach, raw has 67% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg | 99 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 80% more |
| Iron | 0.38 mg | 2.71 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 86% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 28.1 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 100% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 558 mg ★ | Spinach, raw has 83% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.