Beef, shank crosscuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, simmered vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, shank crosscuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, simmered
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, shank crosscuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, simmered | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 201 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, shank crosscuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, simmered has 123% more |
| Protein | 33.68 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, shank crosscuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, simmered has 1576% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 6.36 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, shank crosscuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, simmered has 4140% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 64 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, shank crosscuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, simmered has 78% more |
| Calcium | 32 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 16% more |
| Iron | 3.86 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, shank crosscuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, simmered has 459% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 447 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 6% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.