BURGER KING, Cheeseburger vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, Cheeseburger
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, Cheeseburger | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, Cheeseburger has 218% more |
| Protein | 14.57 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, Cheeseburger has 625% more |
| Carbs | 23.71 g ★ | 20.71 g | BURGER KING, Cheeseburger has 14% more |
| Fat | 14.81 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, Cheeseburger has 9773% more |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sugar | 4.49 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
| Sodium | 602 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, Cheeseburger has 1572% more |
| Calcium | 93 mg ★ | 38 mg | BURGER KING, Cheeseburger has 145% more |
| Iron | 2.5 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | BURGER KING, Cheeseburger has 262% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 178 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.