BURGER KING, Chicken Strips vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, Chicken Strips
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, Chicken Strips | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 292 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, Chicken Strips has 224% more |
| Protein | 18.2 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, Chicken Strips has 805% more |
| Carbs | 20.49 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 1% more |
| Fat | 15.25 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, Chicken Strips has 10067% more |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 859 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, Chicken Strips has 2286% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Iron | 0.62 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Potassium | 315 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.