BURGER KING, Double Cheeseburger vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, Double Cheeseburger
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, Double Cheeseburger | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, Double Cheeseburger has 213% more |
| Protein | 16.83 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, Double Cheeseburger has 737% more |
| Carbs | 17.43 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 16% more |
| Fat | 16.13 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, Double Cheeseburger has 10653% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 4.17 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Sodium | 562 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, Double Cheeseburger has 1461% more |
| Calcium | 120 mg ★ | 38 mg | BURGER KING, Double Cheeseburger has 216% more |
| Iron | 2.33 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | BURGER KING, Double Cheeseburger has 238% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 231 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.