BURGER KING, DOUBLE WHOPPER, no cheese vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, DOUBLE WHOPPER, no cheese
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, DOUBLE WHOPPER, no cheese | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 252 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, DOUBLE WHOPPER, no cheese has 180% more |
| Protein | 13.94 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, DOUBLE WHOPPER, no cheese has 594% more |
| Carbs | 13.74 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Fat | 15.66 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, DOUBLE WHOPPER, no cheese has 10340% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 3.52 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
| Sodium | 289 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, DOUBLE WHOPPER, no cheese has 703% more |
| Calcium | 35 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 8% more |
| Iron | 2.8 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | BURGER KING, DOUBLE WHOPPER, no cheese has 306% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 192 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.