BURGER KING, french fries vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, french fries
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, french fries | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 280 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, french fries has 211% more |
| Protein | 3.23 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, french fries has 61% more |
| Carbs | 38.7 g ★ | 20.71 g | BURGER KING, french fries has 87% more |
| Fat | 12.48 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, french fries has 8220% more |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 12% more |
| Sugar | 0.51 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Sodium | 279 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, french fries has 675% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 0.73 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | BURGER KING, french fries has 6% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Potassium | 467 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 2% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.