BURGER KING, french toast sticks vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, french toast sticks
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, french toast sticks | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 349 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, french toast sticks has 288% more |
| Protein | 6 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, french toast sticks has 199% more |
| Carbs | 41.21 g ★ | 20.71 g | BURGER KING, french toast sticks has 99% more |
| Fat | 17.74 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, french toast sticks has 11727% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 9.89 g | 6.48 g ★ | BURGER KING, french toast sticks has 53% more |
| Sodium | 428 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, french toast sticks has 1089% more |
| Calcium | 53 mg ★ | 38 mg | BURGER KING, french toast sticks has 39% more |
| Iron | 1.92 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | BURGER KING, french toast sticks has 178% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 111 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.