BURGER KING, Hamburger vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, Hamburger
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, Hamburger | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 261 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, Hamburger has 190% more |
| Protein | 14.85 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, Hamburger has 639% more |
| Carbs | 26.76 g ★ | 20.71 g | BURGER KING, Hamburger has 29% more |
| Fat | 10.55 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, Hamburger has 6933% more |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sugar | 5.6 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Sodium | 461 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, Hamburger has 1181% more |
| Calcium | 76 mg ★ | 38 mg | BURGER KING, Hamburger has 100% more |
| Iron | 2.87 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | BURGER KING, Hamburger has 316% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 217 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.