BURGER KING, Onion Rings vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, Onion Rings
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, Onion Rings | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 363% more |
| Protein | 3.86 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 92% more |
| Carbs | 43.58 g ★ | 20.71 g | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 110% more |
| Fat | 25.23 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 16720% more |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Sugar | 5.43 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 16% more |
| Sodium | 776 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 2056% more |
| Calcium | 115 mg ★ | 38 mg | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 203% more |
| Iron | 0.78 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | BURGER KING, Onion Rings has 13% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Potassium | 167 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.