BURGER KING, Original Chicken Sandwich vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, Original Chicken Sandwich
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, Original Chicken Sandwich | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, Original Chicken Sandwich has 218% more |
| Protein | 12.14 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, Original Chicken Sandwich has 504% more |
| Carbs | 26.22 g ★ | 20.71 g | BURGER KING, Original Chicken Sandwich has 27% more |
| Fat | 14.69 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, Original Chicken Sandwich has 9693% more |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Sugar | 3.02 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Sodium | 638 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, Original Chicken Sandwich has 1672% more |
| Calcium | 46 mg ★ | 38 mg | BURGER KING, Original Chicken Sandwich has 21% more |
| Iron | 1.79 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | BURGER KING, Original Chicken Sandwich has 159% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 196 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.