BURGER KING, Premium Fish Sandwich vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, Premium Fish Sandwich
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, Premium Fish Sandwich | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 260 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, Premium Fish Sandwich has 189% more |
| Protein | 10.29 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, Premium Fish Sandwich has 412% more |
| Carbs | 26.69 g ★ | 20.71 g | BURGER KING, Premium Fish Sandwich has 29% more |
| Fat | 12.45 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, Premium Fish Sandwich has 8200% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sugar | 3.53 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
| Sodium | 602 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, Premium Fish Sandwich has 1572% more |
| Calcium | 37 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Iron | 1.5 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | BURGER KING, Premium Fish Sandwich has 117% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 206 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.