BURGER KING, WHOPPER, no cheese vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
BURGER KING, WHOPPER, no cheese
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | BURGER KING, WHOPPER, no cheese | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | BURGER KING, WHOPPER, no cheese has 159% more |
| Protein | 10.74 g ★ | 2.01 g | BURGER KING, WHOPPER, no cheese has 434% more |
| Carbs | 18.55 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
| Fat | 12.84 g | 0.15 g ★ | BURGER KING, WHOPPER, no cheese has 8460% more |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sugar | 4.22 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 35% more |
| Sodium | 313 mg | 36 mg ★ | BURGER KING, WHOPPER, no cheese has 769% more |
| Calcium | 39 mg ★ | 38 mg | BURGER KING, WHOPPER, no cheese has 3% more |
| Iron | 4.37 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | BURGER KING, WHOPPER, no cheese has 533% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 169 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.