Butter replacement, without fat, powder vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Butter replacement, without fat, powder
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Butter replacement, without fat, powder | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 373 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Butter replacement, without fat, powder has 314% more |
| Protein | 2 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 0% more |
| Carbs | 89 g ★ | 20.71 g | Butter replacement, without fat, powder has 330% more |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.15 g ★ | Butter replacement, without fat, powder has 567% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 5.3 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Sodium | 1200 mg | 36 mg ★ | Butter replacement, without fat, powder has 3233% more |
| Calcium | 23 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Iron | 2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Butter replacement, without fat, powder has 190% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 2 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.