CHICK-FIL-A, Chick-n-Strips vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CHICK-FIL-A, Chick-n-Strips
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | CHICK-FIL-A, Chick-n-Strips | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 228 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | CHICK-FIL-A, Chick-n-Strips has 153% more |
| Protein | 21.4 g ★ | 2.01 g | CHICK-FIL-A, Chick-n-Strips has 965% more |
| Carbs | 10.39 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Fat | 11.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | CHICK-FIL-A, Chick-n-Strips has 7367% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sugar | 1.24 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Sodium | 577 mg | 36 mg ★ | CHICK-FIL-A, Chick-n-Strips has 1503% more |
| Calcium | 25 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Iron | 0.97 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | CHICK-FIL-A, Chick-n-Strips has 41% more |
| Vitamin C | 1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Potassium | 497 mg ★ | 475 mg | CHICK-FIL-A, Chick-n-Strips has 5% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.