CHICK-FIL-A, chicken sandwich vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CHICK-FIL-A, chicken sandwich
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | CHICK-FIL-A, chicken sandwich | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 249 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | CHICK-FIL-A, chicken sandwich has 177% more |
| Protein | 16.28 g ★ | 2.01 g | CHICK-FIL-A, chicken sandwich has 710% more |
| Carbs | 20.89 g ★ | 20.71 g | CHICK-FIL-A, chicken sandwich has 1% more |
| Fat | 11.19 g | 0.15 g ★ | CHICK-FIL-A, chicken sandwich has 7360% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 3.64 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Sodium | 753 mg | 36 mg ★ | CHICK-FIL-A, chicken sandwich has 1992% more |
| Calcium | 58 mg ★ | 38 mg | CHICK-FIL-A, chicken sandwich has 53% more |
| Iron | 1.77 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | CHICK-FIL-A, chicken sandwich has 157% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 245 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.