CHICK-FIL-A, hash browns vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CHICK-FIL-A, hash browns
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | CHICK-FIL-A, hash browns | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 301 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | CHICK-FIL-A, hash browns has 234% more |
| Protein | 3 g ★ | 2.01 g | CHICK-FIL-A, hash browns has 49% more |
| Carbs | 30.51 g ★ | 20.71 g | CHICK-FIL-A, hash browns has 47% more |
| Fat | 18.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | CHICK-FIL-A, hash browns has 12233% more |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Sugar | 0.54 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Sodium | 454 mg | 36 mg ★ | CHICK-FIL-A, hash browns has 1161% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 0.65 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 6% more |
| Vitamin C | 6.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Potassium | 456 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 4% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.