Chicken, broilers or fryers, back, meat and skin, cooked, fried, batter vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, back, meat and skin, cooked, fried, batter
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Chicken, broilers or fryers, back, meat and skin, cooked, fried, batter Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 331 kcal 90 kcal Chicken, broilers or fryers, back, meat and skin, cooked, fried, batter has 268% more
Protein 21.97 g 2.01 g Chicken, broilers or fryers, back, meat and skin, cooked, fried, batter has 993% more
Carbs 10.25 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more
Fat 21.91 g 0.15 g Chicken, broilers or fryers, back, meat and skin, cooked, fried, batter has 14507% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 317 mg 36 mg Chicken, broilers or fryers, back, meat and skin, cooked, fried, batter has 781% more
Calcium 26 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more
Iron 1.49 mg 0.69 mg Chicken, broilers or fryers, back, meat and skin, cooked, fried, batter has 116% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 180 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.