Chicken, canned, no broth vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Chicken, canned, no broth
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Chicken, canned, no broth | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 185 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Chicken, canned, no broth has 106% more |
| Protein | 25.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Chicken, canned, no broth has 1159% more |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Fat | 8.1 g | 0.15 g ★ | Chicken, canned, no broth has 5300% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 482 mg | 36 mg ★ | Chicken, canned, no broth has 1239% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Iron | 1.3 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Chicken, canned, no broth has 88% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 153 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.